Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October

Copyright (c) 2026 Ziaulhaq Zargham

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Contested Connectivity: Afghanistan in Eurasian Geoeconomic Networks and Development Scenarios

https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v3i4.431
Ziaulhaq Zargham
Yazd University, Ph.D. Candidate in Sociology of Economics and Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Corresponding Author(s) : Ziaulhaq Zargham

ziakhan.zargham@gmail.com

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October

Abstract

This article examines Afghanistan’s geoeconomic position within contested Eurasian connectivity networks and explores its potential development trajectories under changing regional and domestic conditions. Situated at the intersection of major regional economic spaces, Afghanistan occupies a potentially significant position in emerging patterns of Eurasian connectivity; however, multiple, often competing political, strategic, infrastructural, and institutional factors shape the realization of this potential. Using a qualitative research design, the study applies thematic analysis to 35 purposively selected academic sources identified through Google Scholar, based on publication period, relevance to the research topic, and alignment with the study’s key concepts and keywords. The analysis identifies five interrelated dynamics shaping Afghanistan’s geoeconomic role: Eurasian network reconfiguration, interregional connectivity, infrastructure corridors, strategic competition, and internal barriers. These dynamics do not operate independently; they interact in ways that shape both the opportunities and constraints of Afghanistan’s integration into broader regional economic processes. The study conceptualizes their convergence through the central theme of contested connectivity, highlighting the uncertain, uneven, and conditional nature of Afghanistan’s position within Eurasian networks. Based on this analysis, the study further develops four possible development scenarios: marginalization, strategic insulation, asymmetric dependent connectivity, and integration hub development. The findings suggest that Afghanistan’s future position will depend on the interaction of regional competition, infrastructure development, institutional capacity, and domestic stability, which together will influence the direction and extent of its integration into Eurasian connectivity networks.

Keywords

Afghanistan Geoeconomics Eurasian Networks Regional Integration Contested Connectivity
Zargham, Z. (2026). Contested Connectivity: Afghanistan in Eurasian Geoeconomic Networks and Development Scenarios. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 962–987. https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v3i4.431
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ali, G. (2022). China-Pakistan cooperation on Afghanistan: assessing key interests and implementing strategies. The Pacific Review, 35(3), 506-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1845228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1845228
  2. Asian Development Bank. (April 2026). Asian Development Outlook: The Middle East Conflict Challenges Resilience in Asia and the Pacific. https://dx.doi.org/10.22617/FLS260098-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22617/FLS260098-3
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com.af/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tkz8CwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674545960
  5. Cacicedo, A. S. (2022). Unlocking Afghanistan’s connectivity potential. European Union Institute for Security Studies. https://www.academia.edu/94380336/Unlocking_Afghanistan_s_Connectivity_Potential
  6. Chaghaty, F., & Bagramwal, S. (2025). The Geostrategic Role of Afghanistan in Connecting Central Asia with South Asia. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 8(3), 73-98. https://www.asianinstituteofresearch.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.08.03.584
  7. Clarke, M. (2016). One Belt, One Road and China’s emerging Afghanistan dilemma. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(5), 563-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1183585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1183585
  8. Cooley, A. (2012). Great games, local rules: The new great power contest in Central Asia. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.af/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6DaBSfhi0wUC&oi=fnd&pg DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929825.001.0001
  9. Dhaka, A. (2026). Trans-Afghan Railway Revives the Silk Road: The Geoeconomic Integration and Geopolitical Transformation in South, Central and West Asia. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970261443747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970261443747
  10. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International security, 44(1), 42-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
  11. Forough, M. (2019). Intervention with Chinese characteristics: The Belt and Road Initiative reconfiguring (Afro-)Eurasian geo-economics. Conflict, Security & Development, 19(3), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1608023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1608023
  12. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://www.bebr.ufl.edu/sites/default/files/Centrality%20in%20Social%20Networks.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  13. Jabarkhil., M. & Parikh, M. (2023). BRI Participation of Afghanistan: Assessing Benefits and Drawbacks. American Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science, 6(12), 19-26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376352801_BRI_Participation_of_Afghanistan_Assessing_Benefits_and_Drawbacks
  14. Javaid, F. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Connectivity: Afghanistan's Role Between Pakistan and the Central Asian Region. Analyzing Global Responses to Contemporary Regional Conflicts, 275-297. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/challenges-and-opportunities-for-regional-connectivity/342427
  15. Javaid, F. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Connectivity: Afghanistan's Role Between Pakistan and the Central Asian Region. In P. Pietrzak (Ed.), Analyzing Global Responses to Contemporary Regional Conflicts (pp. 275-297). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch013
  16. Kakar, A. (2023). Afghanistan towards independent transit trade: A decay of affiliation to Pakistan. Global Business Review, 24(3), 586-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920906993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920906993
  17. Kim, Y., & Indeo, F. (2013). The new great game in Central Asia post 2014: the US New Silk Road strategy and Sino-Russian rivalry. Communist and Post-communist studies, 46(2), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.03.005
  18. Ludin GA, Amin MA, Irshad AS, et al. Power transmission in Afghanistan: Challenges, opportunities and proposals. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(4): 840-871. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2024040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2024040
  19. Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest, (20), 17-23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42894676
  20. Mahmood, A. (2025). Navigating Regional Connectivity via Belt and Road Initiative: Prospects and Challenges of South and Central Asian Integration amid Changing Geopolitical Dynamics. Journal of Professional Research in Social Sciences, 12(2), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.58932/MULA0068
  21. Mahmoudinia, D., Estanezahi, A. (2024). Regional Interdependence of Afghanistan Economy. In: Berenguer López, F.J., Castien Maestro, J.I. The Failure of a Pseudo-Democratic State in Afghanistan. Contributions to Security and Defense Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59408-3_16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59408-3_16
  22. Marsden, M. (2021). An alternative Eurasian economic geography: Afghanistan’s role in long-distance trade. Beyond the Silk Roads, Cambridge University Press, 189-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974387.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974387.008
  23. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2018). Regional Connectivity and Afghanistan Vision. Afghanistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://recca.mfa.gov.af/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Presentation-3-Railway-Authority.pdf
  24. Mohapatra, N. K. (2020). Afghanistan’s political insecurity and the emerging geopolitical calculus in Eurasia. International Studies, 57(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881720934336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881720934336
  25. Mubariz, A., Keliwaal, N. (2024), International North-South Transport Corridor Opportunities, Challenges, and the Role of Afghanistan, Educational Administration. Theory and Practice, 30(11), 01-09. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.8208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i11.8208
  26. Noorz, M. (2021). Afghanistan: Regional Connectivity Hub. Wschodnioznawstwo, 15, 287-300. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1195011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/20827695WSC.21.014.14721
  27. Omidi, A., & Noolkar-Oak, G. (2022). Geopolitics of Chabahar port for Iran, India and Afghanistan. South Asia Research, 42(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/02627280211055981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02627280211055981
  28. Price, G., & Hakimi, H. (2019). Reconnecting Afghanistan. Lessons from cross-border engagement. London: Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/CHHJ7132-Afghanistan-Regional-Engagement-RP-WEB.pdf
  29. Rahman, Z. U., Naeem, M., & Ishaq, M. (2022). The geo-economics and geopolitical significance of Gwadar Port in the changing maritime scenario. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 16(4), 121-132. http://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/9
  30. Rakhimov, A. (2018). Complex regionalism in Central Asia: Local, regional, and global factors. Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.22261/CJES.J6Y3O7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22261/CJES.J6Y3O7
  31. Rolland, N. (2017). China's Eurasian century? Political and strategic implications of the belt and road initiative. National Bureau of Asian Research. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/136/book/52595
  32. Roy, M. S. (2017). Afghanistan and the Belt and Road Initiative: Hope, scope, and challenges. Asia Policy, 24(1), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2017.0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2017.0027
  33. Saba, A., Farasoo, A., Akbari, F.& Ibrahimi, N. (2026). Mapping futures for Afghanistan. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032707518
  34. Sadat, S. M. (2015). Tapi and casa-1000: win-win trade between Central Asia and South Asia. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs: OSCE Academy, 25, 1-18. https://www.osce-academy.net/upload/file/Policy_Brief_25.pdf
  35. Safranchuk, I. (2019). Afghanistan’s Political Future and Its Role in Eurasian Cooperation. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 75(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928418821467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928418821467
  36. Saikal, A. (2014). Afghanistan’s geographic possibilities. Survival, 56(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.920152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.920152
  37. Sail, E. Miakhil, J. (2026). Afghanistan in the Heart of Asia: Geopolitical Fragmentation, Climate-Induced Fragility, and the Future of Eurasian Connectivity. Multidisciplinary Journal of Education, Economic and Culture, 4(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.61231/qzq70174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61231/qzq70174
  38. Samad, O. (2024). China and Afghanistan: Navigating Geoeconomic and Geopolitical Pathways at a Time of Great Power Competition. In: Farhadi, A., Grzegorzewski, M., Masys, A.J. (eds) The Great Power Competition Volume 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70767-4_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70767-4_14
  39. Shahi, D. K. (2022). Geopolitical and Geostrategic Significance of Wakhan Corridor. International Journal of Research in Social Science, 12(07), 115-123.‏ https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dharmendra-Shahi/publication/361542066_Geopolitical_and_Geostrategic_Significance_of_Wakhan_Corridor/
  40. Shoaib, K. (2022). Eurasian connectivity: Interests of regional and great powers. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya 22(1), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-126-141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-1-126-141
  41. Summers, T. (2016). China’s New Silk Roads: sub-national regions and networks of global political economy. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1628–1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153415
  42. Tariq, M. T. (2023). The Importance of Lapis Lazuli Corridor for Afghanistan. International Journal of Research in Academic Humanities, 3(5), 276-280. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.5.28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.5.28
  43. The World Bank (February 2026) Afghanistan Economic Monitor. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/5bd07ba36bae064bde8a372b5026f30e-0310012026/original/Afghanistan-Economic-Monitor-February-2026.pdf
  44. Tian, C., Zaki, Z., Ying, H. (2024). Strategic alliance: The contribution of the Belt and Road Initiative to easing trade restrictions for Afghanistan. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(7), 326-342. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.3658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i7.3658
  45. UNDP (April 2025) Afghanistan Socio-Economic Review: Fragile Gains, Deepening Subsistence Insecurity, 2023–2024. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2025-04/undp-afg_so_review-2025-screen.pdf
  46. UNDP (December 2025) Private Sector Mapping in Afghanistan. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2026-02/undp-ps_mapping_afghanistan-2025_0.pdf
  47. Waissi, W. (2025). 14 Geopolitics of Afghanistan. Mapping Futures for Afghanistan. https://books.google.com.af/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZLCEEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=RA1-PT90&dq DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032707518-18
  48. Wallerstein, I. (1993). The modern world system. Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings, 427. https://www.anthrocervone.org/PeoplesandCultures/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Class-9-The-World-System-Perspective1.pdf
  49. Weinbaum, M. G. (2021). Afghanistan and the great powers in regional geopolitics, economics and security. In The Great Power Competition Volume 1: Regional Perspectives on Peace and Security (pp. 413-430). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64473-4_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64473-4_20
  50. World Bank (2012). Afghanistan: Resource Growth Corridors. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/182461468185375731/pdf/797160WP0P12820Box0379789B00PUBLIC0.pdf
  51. World Bank (2012). Afghanistan: Resource Growth Corridors. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/182461468185375731/pdf/797160WP0P12820Box0379789B00PUBLIC0.pdf
  52. World Bank Group (November 2025). Sustaining Returns: Challenges and Opportunities. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/ece486358b8822699ada5d12cdb5cd09-0310012025/original/Fall-ADU-November-2025-Final-for-Publication.pdf
  53. World Bank. (2014). Afghanistan - CASA-1000 Community Support Program Project. Washington DC; World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/735311467994640974
  54. YAR, F., Zahid, S., Miakhil, J. (2023). Afghanistan's Geopolitical and Geoeconomic Significance in Regional Connectivity and Development. Journal of Political and Legal Sovereignty, 1(3), 79-89. https://acityajournal.com/index.php/jpls/article/view/86/499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v1i3.86
  55. Yawar, M. E. (2024). Investigating the Political, Economic and Geopolitical Role of Afghanistan's Wakhan Corridor in China's Belt and Road Initiative. Law and Humanities Quarterly Reviews, 3(1), 39-53. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4697991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1996.03.01.101
  56. Zreik, M. (2025). Afghanistan’s Role in the Belt and Road Initiative: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Nandy, D., Das, M. (eds) Decoding the Chessboard of Asian Geopolitics. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3368-5_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3368-5_12
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 6 Download : 2