Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October

Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Fahim Karimi, Madhu Lal M.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Employees' Pro-Environmental Behaviors: A Bibliometric Review and Future Research Agenda

https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v3i4.283
Mohammad Fahim Karimi
Mahatma Gandhi University, School of Management and Business Studies, Kerala, India
Madhu Lal M.
Mahatma Gandhi University, School of Management and Business Studies, Kerala, India

Corresponding Author(s) : Mohammad Fahim Karimi

mohammadfahim@mgu.ac.in

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October

Abstract

Due to recent environmental challenges, employees’ pro-environmental behaviors (EPEB) have received considerable attention in pursuit of sustainability. Despite empirical and review studies in this area, future researchers still have scope to explore new theories, contexts, characteristics, and methodologies. Additionally, only two review papers have been published in the Scopus database on this topic, and neither is a bibliometric analysis. To address this gap, this study systematically reviews the literature through a bibliometric analysis to identify publication patterns, the field's conceptual, intellectual, and social structure, and future research directions. Methodology. Using the Scopus database and the Boolean operator “OR”, we searched for terms related to employees’ pro-environmental behaviors in 2025. The database automatically identified 162 documents from 2013 to 2025; after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 137 documents remained for analysis. Findings. Thematic analysis indicates that EPEB is a less developed concept with medium centrality or importance and thus warrants further study. Additionally, publications are increasing gradually, with 27 articles in 2024. A prominent journal is Sustainability (Switzerland). The most prominent country related to corresponding authors and publications is China. Conclusion. This study contributes to the literature by addressing the scarcity of bibliometric reviews on EPEB. Through bibliometric analysis, this study reports what is known by conducting performance analysis and science mapping, and what is unknown by mapping the future research agenda. Lastly, the practical implications of EPEB on organizational sustainability strategies, green HRM, and managerial decision-making are explained.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior's EPEB Review Sustainability
Karimi, M. F., & M., M. L. (2026). Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors: A Bibliometric Review and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 1099–1133. https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v3i4.283
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Kiani, U. S. (2016). Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.011
  2. Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2018). Activating employee’s pro-environmental behaviors: The role of CSR, organizational identification, and environmentally specific servant leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1506
  3. Afsar, B., & Umrani, W. A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1777
  4. Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., Arshad, M. Z., Kamran, H. waqas, Scholz, M., & Han, H. (2021). Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1138–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.034
  5. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  6. Alherimi, N., Marva, Z., Hamarsheh, K., & Alzaaterh, A. (2024). Employees’ pro-environmental behavior in an organization: a case study in the UAE. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66047-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66047-4
  7. Ali, M. A., Khan, A. Z., Azeem, M. U., & Inam, ul H. (2023). How does environmental corporate social responsibility contribute to the development of a green corporate image? The sequential mediating roles of employees’ environmental passion and pro-environmental behavior. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 32(3), 896–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12539
  8. Ansari, H. U. H., & Khan, S. N. (2024). Linking green transformational leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The role of intention and work environment. Sustainable Futures, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100336
  9. Appelbaum, Eileen. (2000). Manufacturing advantage : why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
  10. Ayres, Ian., & Braithwaite, John. (1997). Responsive Regulation : Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press, USA.
  11. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
  12. Bandura, A. (1988). Organisational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management, 13(2), 275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289628801300210
  13. Bentler, D., Kadi, G., & Maier, G. W. (2023). Increasing pro-environmental behavior in the home and work contexts through cognitive dissonance and autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199363
  14. Bissing-Olson, M. J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K. S., & Zacher, H. (2013). Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1788
  15. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in Social Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
  16. Cheng, Z., Wu, B., Deng, X., & Li, W. (2022). The impact of employees’ pro-environmental behaviors on corporate green innovation performance: The mediating effect of green organizational identity. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984856
  17. Chua, B. L., Chi, X., Wichupankul, S., Lee, J. S., Meng, B., & Han, H. (2024). Promoting individual and organization-oriented sustainable behaviors among employees in tourism and hospitality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103822
  18. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An Interdisciplinary review. In Journal of Management (Vol. 31, Number 6, pp. 874–900). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
  21. Din, M. ud, Ahmad, A., Samad, S., Lee, S., & Han, H. (2025a). Sowing the seeds of sustainability: A sociological exploration of environmental sustainability within SME sector. Climate Services, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100533
  22. Din, M. ud, Ahmad, A., Samad, S., Lee, S., & Han, H. (2025b). Sowing the seeds of sustainability: A sociological exploration of environmental sustainability within SME sector. Climate Services, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100533
  23. Dong, E., Sun, R., & Lee, Y. (2024). Linking interacting/engaging environmental CSR communication strategy and employees’ pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs): mediating roles of communal relationship and employee empowerment. Corporate Communications, 29(3), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2023-0068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2023-0068
  24. Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017). Effects of Green HRM Practices on Employee Workplace Green Behavior: The Role of Psychological Green Climate and Employee Green Values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21792
  25. Elshaer, I. A., Azazz, A. M. S., & Fayyad, S. (2023). Green Management and Sustainable Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Hospitality Businesses: Moderating the Role of an Employee’s Pro-Environmental Behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032244
  26. Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., Ying, M., & Mehmood, S. A. (2021). The interplay of green servant leadership, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation in predicting employees’ pro-environmental behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1171–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2115
  27. Farooq, K., & Yusliza, M. Y. (2023). Two decades of workplace ecological behaviour: a systematic literature review. In Benchmarking (Vol. 30, Number 10, pp. 4681–4716). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2022-0079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2022-0079
  28. Farrukh, M., Rafiq, M., Karatepe, O. M., & Raza, A. (2025). Unleashing the Pygmalion’s nudge: The roles of leadership styles and leader expectations in driving employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103999
  29. Gkorezis, P., & Petridou, E. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behaviour: organisational identification as a mediator. In European J. International Management (Vol. 11, Number 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2017.081248
  30. Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., Mussina, K., & Li, J. (Justin). (2024). From personal convictions to collective action: Predicting employees’ pro-environmental behaviors in public and private spheres. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103864
  31. Hongxin, W., Khan, M. A., Zhenqiang, J., Cismaș, L. M., Ali, M. A., Saleem, U., & Negruț, L. (2022). Unleashing the Role of CSR and Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behavior for Organizational Success: The Role of Connectedness to Nature. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063191
  32. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. In Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making (Vol. 4, pp. 99–127). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006
  33. Kim, B. J., Kim, M. J., & Lee, J. (2024). Code green: ethical leadership’s role in reconciling AI-induced job insecurity with pro-environmental behavior in the digital workplace. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04139-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04139-2
  34. Lame, G. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2019-August, 1633–1642. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169
  35. Lee, Y., Dong, E., & Sun, R. (2024). The Power of Internal Communication for Environmental Sustainability in Promoting Employee’s Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Public Relations Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2024.2357334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2024.2357334
  36. Leitão, P., Mouro, C., Duarte, A. P., & Luís, S. (2024). Promoting pro-environmental behaviours at work: the role of green organizational climate and supervisor support / Fomentando las conductas proambientales en el trabajo: el papel del clima organizacional verde y el apoyo del supervisor . PsyEcology: Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/21711976241263474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21711976241263474
  37. Lu, H., Liu, X., Chen, H., & Long, R. (2019). Employee–Organization Pro-environmental Values Fit and Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Supervisors’ Personal Values. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 519–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0007-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0007-z
  38. Lu, H., Liu, X., Chen, H., Long, R., & Yue, T. (2017). Who contributed to “corporation green” in China? A view of public- and private-sphere pro-environmental behavior among employees. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.008
  39. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  40. Mansour, M., Aman, N., Al-Ghazali, B. M., & Shah, S. H. A. (2022). Perceived corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, and moral reflectiveness impact on pro-environmental behavior among employees of small and medium enterprises: A double-mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967859
  41. Mateen, A. ul, Nisar, Q. A., & Nasir, N. (2023a). Fostering pro-environmental behaviors in the healthcare organizations: An empirical analysis of psychological and strategic factors. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.01.004
  42. Mateen, A. ul, Nisar, Q. A., & Nasir, N. (2023b). Fostering pro-environmental behaviors in the healthcare organizations: An empirical analysis of psychological and strategic factors. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.01.004
  43. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Meyer, institutional theory. American Journal of Psychology, 83(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  44. Min, Y. A., Hao, M., Yang, X., Ling, D. Y., & Yuan, J. S. (2024). How employee corporate social responsibility participation promotes pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Earth Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1393386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1393386
  45. Omarova, L., & Jo, S. J. (2022). Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Impact of Environmental Transformational Leadership and GHRM. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042046
  46. Palácios, H., de Almeida, H., & Sousa, M. J. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of service climate as a sustainable competitive advantage in hospitality. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Number 21). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112214
  47. Paul, J., & Rosado-Serrano, A. (2019). Gradual Internationalization vs Born-Global/International new venture models: A review and research agenda. In International Marketing Review (Vol. 36, Number 6, pp. 830–858). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280
  48. Paulsy, L., & M, M. L. (2024). Why do investors prefer sustainability? A bibliometric review and research agenda. Vilakshan - XIMB Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/xjm-01-2024-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-01-2024-0015
  49. Perano, M., Aisha, R., Channa, N. A., & Casali, G. L. (2024). The nexus between green HRM and environmental performance for sustainable business excellence: the role of employees’ environmental passion and pro-environmental behavior. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2024.2430258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2024.2430258
  50. Ren, Q., Li, W., & Mavros, C. (2024). Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Practices: How Leadership Style Shapes Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156499
  51. Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1820
  52. Sabbir, M. M., & Taufique, K. M. R. (2022). Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non-cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2877
  53. Saifulina, N., Carballo-Penela, A., & Ruzo-Sanmartín, E. (2024). Harmonious environmental passion and voluntary pro-environmental behavior at home and at work: a moderated mediation model to examine the role of cultural femininity. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05194-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05194-0
  54. Shah, S. H. A., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Bhatti, S., Aman, N., Fahlevi, M., Aljuaid, M., & Hasan, F. (2023). The Impact of Perceived CSR on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Environmental Consciousness and Environmental Commitment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054350
  55. Sharpe, E., Ruepert, A., van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2022). Corporate environmental responsibility leads to more pro-environmental behavior at work by strengthening intrinsic pro-environmental motivation. One Earth, 5(7), 825–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.006
  56. Song, W., Deng, J., Zhang, F., Peng, X., & Jin, X. (2024). Activating employee pro-environmental behavior in the workplace: the effects of environmental self-identity and behavioral integrity. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03549-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03549-7
  57. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. In Source: Human Ecology Review (Vol. 6, Number 2).
  58. Suchman, & Mark C. (1995). The Academy of Management Review. In Jul (Vol. 20). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
  59. Sundarasen, S., Rajagopalan, U., & Alsmady, A. A. (2024). Environmental Accounting and Sustainability: A Meta-Synthesis. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 16, Number 21). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219341
  60. Tajfel, H. & T. J. C. (1985). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Political Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 7–24).
  61. Tian, Q., & Robertson, J. L. (2019). How and When Does Perceived CSR Affect Employees’ Engagement in Voluntary Pro-environmental Behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3497-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3497-3
  62. Tran, T. T., Luong, D. H., & Nguyen, T. T. D. (2024). A Bibliometrics Analysis of Scopus-Indexed Research on Teachers’ Well-Being from 1995-2022: Emerging Research Trends. In European Journal of Educational Research (Vol. 13, Number 2, pp. 457–478). Eurasian Society of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.2.457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.2.457
  63. Tu, Y., Li, Y., & Zuo, W. (2023). Arousing employee pro-environmental behavior: A synergy effect of environmentally specific transformational leadership and green human resource management. Human Resource Management, 62(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22138
  64. Ture, R. S., & Ganesh, M. P. (2018). Pro-environmental behaviours at workplace: An empirical study in Indian manufacturing organizations. Benchmarking, 25(9), 3743–3766. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2017-0193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2017-0193
  65. Usman, M., Rofcanin, Y., Ali, M., Ogbonnaya, C., & Babalola, M. T. (2023). Toward a more sustainable environment: Understanding why and when green training promotes employees’ eco-friendly behaviors outside of work. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22148
  66. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. In Source: MIS Quarterly (Vol. 27, Number 3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  67. Yang, D., Law, K. S., & Tang, G. (2023). Not all pro-environmental initiatives can increase pro-environmental behavior: An empirical examination of employees’ pro-environmental attributions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102177
  68. Yang, D., Tang, G., & Jia, J. (2025). Greening for greater meaning: A dynamic examination of the consequences of voluntary employee green behavior. Journal of Business Research, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115007
  69. Yang, M., & Li, Z. (2023). The influence of green human resource management on employees’ green innovation behavior: The role of green organizational commitment and knowledge sharing. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22161
  70. Young, W., Davis, M., McNeill, I. M., Malhotra, B., Russell, S., Unsworth, K., & Clegg, C. W. (2015). Changing Behaviour: Successful Environmental Programmes in the Workplace. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1836
  71. Yuan, B., & Li, J. (2023). Understanding the Impact of Environmentally Specific Servant Leadership on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors in the Workplace: Based on the Proactive Motivation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010567
  72. Zhang, H., & Sun, S. (2021). Cognitive dissonance of self-standards: A negative interaction of green compensation and green training on employee pro-environmental behavior in china. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1399–1418. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S325091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S325091
  73. Zhang, H., & Sun, S. (2024a). The (in)congruence effects of organizational green compensation and employee green conscientiousness on pro-environmental behavior: evidence from China. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 623. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02122-9
  74. Zhang, H., & Sun, S. (2024b). The (in)congruence effects of organizational green compensation and employee green conscientiousness on pro-environmental behavior: evidence from China. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 623. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02122-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02122-9
  75. Zhang, J., & Huang, R. (2019). Employees’ pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) at international hotel chains (IHCs) in China: The mediating role of environmental concerns (ECs). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.03.007
  76. Zhang, Y., Duan, C., Zhang, J., & Akhtar, M. N. (2024). Positive leadership and employees’ pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 43(40), 31405–31415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06727-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06727-6
  77. Zheng, Y., Gao, Y. (Lisa), & Thomas, N. (2025). Enhancing tourism and hospitality organizations’ ESG via transformational leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The effect of organizational culture. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103970
  78. Zientara, P., & Zamojska, A. (2018). Green organizational climates and employee pro-environmental behaviour in the hotel industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1142–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1206554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1206554
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 4 Download : 2