Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): October

Copyright (c) 2025 Rohullah Samim, Muhammad Ishaq Noori

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The Significance of Scientific Research in Higher Education Institutions of Afghanistan: Challenges, Solutions, and Strategies for Enhancement (2022-2024)

https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v2i4.98
Rohullah Samim
Ghalib University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Law Department, Kabul, Afghanistan
Muhammad Ishaq Noori
Ghalib University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Law Department, Kabul, Afghanistan
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-0319

Corresponding Author(s) : Rohullah Samim

samim@ghalib.edu.af

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): October

Abstract

Scientific research is a fundamental pillar of higher education institutions (HEIs), driving knowledge production, innovation, and national development. This study explores the significance of scientific research within Afghanistan’s HEIs, identifies key challenges that impede its development, and proposes strategies to enhance it. Employing a qualitative, descriptive-analytical design, the research uses content analysis of data gathered through semi-structured interviews and a comprehensive literature review. A total of 30 participants were selected based on expertise, experience, and academic background, in line with the principle of theoretical saturation. The findings highlight the crucial role of scientific research in improving education quality, fostering researcher expertise, generating new knowledge, and strengthening academic recognition in Afghanistan. However, significant barriers hinder progress, including insufficient funding, outdated infrastructure, limited research tools, limited global collaboration, bureaucratic inefficiencies, a shortage of qualified researchers, and the commercialization of private universities. To address these obstacles, the study recommends comprehensive policy reforms such as capacity-building programs, improved access to up-to-date academic resources, the establishment of institutional research committees and peer-reviewed journals, enhanced financial support, and a strategic cultural shift to prioritize research within HEIs.

Keywords

Academic Development Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research Research Challenges
Samim, R., & Noori, M. I. (2025). The Significance of Scientific Research in Higher Education Institutions of Afghanistan: Challenges, Solutions, and Strategies for Enhancement (2022-2024). Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(4), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v2i4.98
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2016). Global perspectives on higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421419268
  2. Jalal, F., & Ayubi, M. (2020). The status of research culture in Afghanistan higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Afghanistan Journal of Higher Education Studies.
  3. Margin son, S. (2018). The new geo-politics of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1619- https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1521264
  4. UNESCO. (2021). the role of higher education in sustainable development: A global perspective. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Link
  5. World Bank. (2022). Higher education reform in post-conflict societies: Challenges and pathways for development. World Bank Publications. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/xxxx
  6. Stanikzai, et al. (2023). Conducting Health Research in the Current Afghanistan Society: Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 16, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s441105 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S441105
  7. Khan, S., & Durrani, Z. (2024). The Future of Afghanistan under the Taliban-Led Regime: Challenges and Likely Scenarios. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ),8(1), 60-65.https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/8.1.1 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/8.1.1
  8. Mode adze, M. (2022). Afghanistan Under Taliban: A New Regime Poses a Threat to International Stability. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 1(2), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.47305/jlia2281277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2281277m
  9. Younus, A. (2024). The Failure of Liberal Interventionism: Deconstructing Afghanistan Identity Discourses of “Modern” and “Tradition.” Politics and Governance, 12(2), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7380
  10. Yar, M. J. (2024). Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities for Improving the Health System in Afghanistan: Innovative Approaches and Sustainable Solutions. Journal Social Technology, 4(10), 102-30.https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v4i10.27615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v4i10.27615
  11. Quraishi, A., Babaei, R., & Rahim, S. (2024). Examining the Influence of Digital Learning on Women's Education in Afghanistan: An In-Depth Analysis of Women Online University. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 2(11), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i11.234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i11.234
  12. Ismail, F., Nasir, H., & Bacha, I. (2022). Strategy, Policy, and Legal Barriers to E-Gov Implementation in Afghanistan. IEEE Access, 10, 150-153. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3144198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3144198
  13. Imranullah, M., & Hakimuddin, Z. (2024). Strategic Interests and Geopolitical Considerations: Assessing the Importance of Afghanistan for the US Post-Withdrawal. Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v1i2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v1i2.18
  14. Van, & Tuyet. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Factors on the Scientific Research Productivity of Lecturers. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 5(4), p. 15. https://doi:10.51594/ijarss.v5i4.504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v5i4.504
  15. Obame-Nkoghe et al. (2024). Climate-influenced Vector-borne Diseases in Africa: A Call to Empower the Next Generation of African Researchers for Sustainable Solutions. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 13(2), p. 102. https://doi:10.1186/s40249-024-01193-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-024-01193-5
  16. Liu et al. (2024). Scientific Research Project Curriculum: A Clever Teaching Method of “Scientific Research Nurturing Teaching”. SHS Web of Conferences, 187(1), p. 87. https://doi:10.1051/shsconf/202418701018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418701018
  17. Hammad. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51(3), p. 230.
  18. https://doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1
  19. Bahaman. (2023). Balancing Innovation and Integrity: The Role of AI in Research and Scientific Writing. Nature and Science of Sleep, 15, p. 312.
  20. https://doi:10.2147/nss.s455765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S455765
  21. Gruetzemacher. (2023). Leveraging Foundation Models for Scientific Research Productivity. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 23(3), p. 45.
  22. https://doi:10.34257/gjcstdvol23is3pg31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34257/GJCSTDVOL23IS3PG31
  23. Hildebrandt, & Goldschmidt. (2024). Enhancing the Connection between Basic and Applied Research in Eating Disorders: Steps toward More Effective Translation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 57(1), p. 178. https://doi:10.1002/eat.24239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24239
  24. Zhou, P., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Evaluation of the Effect of Sentinel-1 SAR and Environmental Factors in Alfalfa Yield and Quality Estimation. Agronomy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  25. Agustina, W., Degeng, N., Praherdhiono, H., & Lestaric, S. (2023). The effect of blended project-based learning for enhancing student’s scientific literacy skills: an experimental study in university. Pegegog, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.24
  26. Alba Salah, A., Alshawwa, S., & Alarnous, R. (2022). Use of artificial intelligence in activating the role of Saudi universities in joint scientific research between university teachers and students. Plos One, 17(5), e0267301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267301
  27. Cheng, Z., Chen, C., Yueyang, Z., Xiong, X., & Xiao, T. (2023). Evaluation of scientific research in universities based on the theories for sustainable competitive advantage. Sage Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231177048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231177048
  28. Jannah, R. (2023). Human relationship management implementation strategy in improving the performance of educators in higher educational institutions. AJESH, 2(12), 1531-1538. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i11.188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i11.188
  29. Lei, H. (2023). The strategy of implementing effective scientific research management system in colleges using dea method under the analysis of multiple cases. International Journal of New Developments in Education, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.25236/ijnde.2023.050819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2023.050819
  30. Nezai, A., Ramli, M., & Refafa, B. (2022). The relationship between the scientific activities in research laboratories with webometrics ranking of Algerian universities: an empirical investigation. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(1).67-82.2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(1).67-82.2022
  31. Yu, L., Ye, J., & Chen, Y. (2023). Exploring the model of laboratory construction and optimization to promote the transformation of research results in the context of big data. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00125
  32. Awwad, B., Anaewah, M., Razia, B., & Salameh, M. (2023). Governance boards of trustees: quality of higher education and the outputs of scientific research. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 4(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.130/jbsed-03-2023-0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-03-2023-0021
  33. Hang, A. and Van, D. (2024). Some solutions for developing scientific research capacity for lecturers at university of education - Thai Nguyen University. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(08). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-68
  34. Herasymenko, O., Hrytsai, N., Karskanova, S., Pliushch, V., & Protsenko, I. (2024). Development of research competence in university students through cloud-oriented technologies: a pedagogical experiment. 13(77), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2024.77.05.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.77.05.5
  35. Mamytbayeva, Z., Orynbetova, E., Kyyakbayeva, U., Yeralin, K., & Yeralina, A. (2024). Foundations for shaping the research culture of future teachers-educators in higher education institution. Bordón Revista De Pedagogía, 76(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2024.97666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2024.97666
  36. Vovchenko, O. (2023). The role of heis of Ukraine in the implementation of social innovations. Professional Education Methodology Theory and Technologies, (17), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.31470/2415-3729-2023-17-65-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2415-3729-2023-17-65-78
  37. Zhou, Y. and Zhang, D. (2024). Research on measuring research efficiency of universities in Liaoning province based on gpca model and dea model. 60. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3034937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3034937
  38. Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business & management. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  39. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.300/14780880903340091
  40. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th Edition. Sage. https://books.google.com/books/
  41. Willig, C., & Stainton Rogers, W. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2nd Edition. Sage. https://books.google.com/books/about/ iDgAAQBAJ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
  42. Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative Research in Business & Management. 2nd Edition. Sage.https://books.google.comt/Qualitative_Research_in_Business_Manageme.html?i
  43. Klykken, F. H. (2022). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366
  44. Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Mollås, G., Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the pilot study: A neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341
  45. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://10.300/17439760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
  46. Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2011). The Unintended Consequences of Public Policy: The Role of Government in Innovation and Research. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 11, 39-61.https://books.google.com.af(2011):+The+R +the+Eco1,+39-61. Katz, J. (2017). The Role of International Collaboration in Advancing Research Outcomes. Higher Education Policy, 30(4), 335-348. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/S11192-020-03460-2
  47. Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2001). Innovation: Location Matters. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 28-36. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/innovation-location-matters/
  48. Peters, T. (2020). Effective Collaboration Networks for Academic Research: Insights from Global Practices. International Journal of Educational Development, 72, 102141. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-66003-1_39
  49. Rahimi, A., & Ayobi, M. (2022). Theoretical analysis of quality assurance and accreditation standards of Afghanistan’s Ministry of Higher Education. Kabul University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(2). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/
  50. Basiri, Hossein. (2010). Achievements, Challenges, Crises, and Drivers of Higher Education Serial Number: 16751, Tehran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
  51. Hanafi, Ghulam Mohammad. (2018). The Importance of Research and Its Role in Higher Education retrieved from https://shifa.edu.af.
  52. Rigi, Atefeh & Azizi, Nematullah. (2019). Analysis of Research Challenges in the Weak Position of Universities and Higher Education Institutions in Global Ranking Systems.
  53. Safari, Saeed & Kolahi, Bahareh. (2013). Identifying Factors Affecting the Commercialization of Research in Universities and Higher Education Institutions in the Country, Faculty of Technical and Vocational Studies, Sama College, Islamshahr Branch, Safari@shahed.ac.ir.
  54. Mojtabazadeh et al. (2018). Accreditation Model and Quality Assurance of Higher Education System in Iran from the Perspective of Experts, Quarterly Research in Educational Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 42.
  55. Nazari, Mohammad Ali. (2021). A Critical Perspective on the Higher Education System of Afghanistan (With Emphasis on Critical Pedagogy), Tehran, Biannual Journal of Educational Science Findings, Vol. 1, Issue 1.
  56. Ministry of Education in collaboration with the Ministry of Higher Education of Afghanistan. (2019). Survey Report on Transparency and Quality of Educational Services in Public and Private Schools and Universities.
  57. Mursal Dawod et al. (2023). Leveraging mobile learning platforms for flexible education delivery: bridging educational gaps in Afghanistan. Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering, 2(4)https://doi.org/10.33140/jeee.02.04.18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33140/JEEE.02.04.18
  58. Bhowmik, J., Gunarathne, L., Bhar, S., Bhowmik, U., & Biswas, R. (2024). Antenatal care visits, institutional births, and associated risk factors in Afghanistan: insights from the multiple indicator cluster survey 2022‐2023. Journal of Midwifery & Women S Health, 70(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13666
  59. Franklin, K., Halvorson, S., & Brown, F. (2023). Impacts of service learning on tourism students’ sustainability competencies in conflict-affected bamyan, Afghanistan. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(6), 1328-1346. https://doi.org/10.130/ijshe-04-2022-0112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-04-2022-0112
  60. Gardiwal, H., Saeedzai, A., Feroz, F., Knight, J., Ukasha, M., Durrani, N., & Sayedzai, S. (2024). Determinants of institutional delivery in Afghanistan: a secondary analysis of multi indicator cluster surevey (mics) 2022 and 2023 data.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5008241/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5008241/v1
  61. Hadfi, R., Okuhara, S., Haqbeen, J., Sahab, S., Ohnuma, S., & Itō, T. (2023). Conversational agents enhance women's contribution in online debates. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41703-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41703-3
  62. Momand, Z. and Gul, S. (2023). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance with the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences. https://doi.org/10.31841/kjems.2023.136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31841/KJEMS.2023.136
  63. Monib, W. (2023). Afghan undergraduate students’ perceptions toward e-learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(6), 535-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231180029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231180029
  64. Sadat, A. and Sadaat, A. (2023). Comprehensive framework for mitigating digital divide factors in higher education. JNSR, 1(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v1i1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v1i1.6
  65. Zayachuk, Y. (2024). Ensuring quality higher education in Ukraine in times of war. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 31(1), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714241270254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714241270254
  66. Abdullahi, L., Hara, H., Kahurani, E., Kamthunzi, V., Nthakomwa, L., Oronje, R., & Madise, N. (2023). Eidm training as a key intervention among researchers to enhance research uptake and policy engagement: an evaluation study. Welcome Open Research, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18018.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18018.2
  67. Akerjordet, K., Lode, K., & Severinsson, E. (2012). Clinical nurses' research capacity in a Norwegian university hospital: part 2. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(6), 824-832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01473.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01473.x
  68. Carter, N., Dawson, J., Simonee, N., Tagalik, S., & Ljubicic, G. (2019). Lessons learned through research partnership and capacity enhancement in Inuit nunangat. Arctic, 72(4), 381-403. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic69507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic69507
  69. Grigorovich, A., Fang, M., Six smith, J., & Kontos, P. (2018). Defining and evaluating Tran’s disciplinary research: implications for aging and technology. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 14(6), 533-542. https://doi.org/10.300/17483107.2018.1496361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1496361
  70. Hawkes, S., Aulakh, B., Jadeja, N., Jiménez, M., Buse, K., Anwar, I., & Whitworth, J. (2015). Strengthening capacity to apply health research evidence in policy making: experience from four countries. Health Policy and Planning, 31(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czv032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czv032
  71. Jagosh, J., Macaulay, A., Pluye, P., Salsberg, J., Bush, P., Henderson, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2012). Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Quarterly, 90(2), 311-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x
  72. ПИЛИПІВ, В. and Семикрас, В. (2021). Історичний процес через призму культурно-цивілізаційного підходу: минуле та сучасність. Східноєвропейський Історичний Вісник, (20), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.20.240039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058X.20.240039
  73. Lode, K., Sørensen, E., Salmela, S., Holm, A., & Severinsson, E. (2015). Clinical nurses’ research capacity building in practice systematic review. Open Journal of Nursing, 05(07), 664-677. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2015.57070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2015.57070
  74. Ogega, O., Majani, M., Hendricks, C., Adegun, O., Mbatudde, M., Charles, M., & Gyasi, R. (2023). Research leadership in africa: perspectives from the social sciences, humanities, and arts.. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202302.0370.v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202302.0370.v1
  75. Probandari, A., Mahendradhata, Y., Widjanarko, B., & Alisjahbana, B. (2017). Social multiplier effects: academics’ and practitioners’ perspective on the benefits of a tuberculosis operational research capacity-building program in Indonesia. Global Health Action, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.300/16549716.2017.1381442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1381442
  76. Renwick, L., Keliat, B., Lovell, K., & Yung, A. (2017). Implementing an innovative intervention to increase research capacity for enhancing early psychosis care in Indonesia. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 24(9-10), 671-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12417
  77. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  78. Tagoe, N., Pulford, J., Kinyanjui, S., & Molyneux, S. (2022). A framework for managing health research capacity strengthening consortia: addressing tensions and enhancing capacity outcomes. BMJ Global Health, 7(10), e009472. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009472
  79. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering integrity in research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/21896
  80. Tait, H. and Williamson, A. (2019). A literature review of knowledge translation and partnership research training programs for health researchers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0497-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0497-z
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 660 Download : 753