Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April

Copyright (c) 2025 Abdullah Noori, Baryalai Fazli, Mohammad Rahim Janbaz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Perception and Use of Library Resources Among Undergraduate English Majors Students

https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v2i2.87
Baryalai Fazli
Kabul University, Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages & Literature, Kabul, AF
Abdullah Noori
Kabul University, Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages & Literature, Kabul, AF
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-3675
Mohammad Rahim Janbaz
Kabul University, Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages & Literature, Kabul, AF

Corresponding Author(s) : Baryalai Fazli

fazli@gmail.com

Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April

Abstract

This study investigated the perceptions and utilization of library resources among undergraduate English major students at Kabul University’s English Department. Academic libraries play a critical role in supporting higher education; however, little is known about how students in under-resourced university settings perceive and engage with these services. The study employed a quantitative survey design to address this research gap, collecting data from 159 students using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were used to analyze patterns in students’ experiences. The results revealed that while many students valued the library’s range of resources and its contribution to academic success, substantial challenges existed. Students reported difficulties accessing digital and print materials, indicating problems with organization, usability, and availability problems. Although the perceived quality of resources was moderate, many expressed concerns about outdated collections and limited relevance to current coursework. Additionally, the study found that library services had a positive impact on research and writing skills. However, this impact was constrained by insufficient user training, limited staff support for digital tools, and underdeveloped online services. Students appreciated the physical facilities and support from staff but also emphasized the need for more responsive services. Recommendations included improving digital infrastructure, updating materials, and expanding information literacy training.

Keywords

Academic performance English majors Information literacy Kabul University Library resources Resource utilization Student perceptions
Fazli, B., Noori, A., & Janbaz, M. R. (2025). Perception and Use of Library Resources Among Undergraduate English Majors Students. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.62810/jssh.v2i2.87
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Anjaline, C., & Priskkillal, C. S. (2020). Library Anxiety: A Barrier to Effective Use of Information Resources (pp. 38–58). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1482-5.CH004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1482-5.ch004
  2. Babbie, E. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  3. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  4. Berzonsky, W. A., & Richardson, K. D. (2008). Referencing Science: Teaching Undergraduates to Identify, Validate, and Utilize Peer-Reviewed Online Literature. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 37(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2134/JNRLSE2008.3718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jnrlse2008.3718
  5. British Psychological Society. (2014). Code of human research ethics. BPS Link
  6. Chu, S. K., & Du, H. S. (2013). Social networking tools for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611434361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611434361
  7. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  8. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441
  9. Connaway, L. S., Harvey, W., Kitzie, V., & Mikitish, S. (2017). Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research. Association of College & Research Libraries.
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  11. De Groote, S. L., & Scoulas, J. M. (2022). The impact of the academic library on students' success, in their own words. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(2), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0021
  12. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
  13. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645
  14. Ekere, J. N., & Omekwu, C. O. (2021). Academic library services and student satisfaction: A study of Nigerian universities. Library Management, 42(6/7), 389–402.
  15. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  16. Fister, B. (2015). The importance of academic libraries. Library Journal, 140(15), 32–34.
  17. Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230184
  18. Haddow, G., & Joseph, J. (2010). Loans, logins, and lasting the course: Academic library use and student retention. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(4), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721478
  19. Hafsyah, I. S., Ridwan, A., & Heri, P. (2023). How Can Libraries Support Student Research? 1(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.knowledgegarden.2023.1.1.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.knowledgegarden.2023.1.1.8
  20. Head, A. J. (2013). Learning the ropes: How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college. Project Information Literacy. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364080
  21. Hossain, M. J., & Islam, M. A. (2019). User satisfaction with library resources and services in university libraries: A case study. Reference Services Review, 47(3), 277-294.
  22. Julien, H., Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2018). Survey of information literacy instructional practices in U.S. academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 79(3), 332-350. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.2.179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.2.179
  23. Kim, K.-S., & Yang, C. (2016). User perceptions of academic library services: A survey of undergraduate students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(4), 359–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.013
  24. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  25. Lance, K. C., & Schwarz, B. (2012). The impact of school libraries on student achievement. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), The future of library services for and with teens: A call to action (pp. 45–60). Wiley.
  26. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5–55.
  27. Noori, A. (2024). Library anxiety unveiled: Impact on students’ engagement with library resources and academic performance at Kabul University. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 31(1–2), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2024.2327309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2024.2327309
  28. Oakleaf, M. (2014). A roadmap for assessing student learning using the new framework for information literacy for higher education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(5), 510–514. https://meganoakleaf.info/framework.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.08.001
  29. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
  30. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  31. Resnik, D. B. (2018). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8
  32. Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
  33. Sami, A. (2020). Measuring the Impact of Using Library Resources: The Context of Secondary Students’ Academic Achievement. 1(1), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.48112/JEMSS.V1I1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48112/jemss.v1i1.4
  34. Saunders, L. (2015). Academic libraries’ strategic plans: Top trends and under-recognized areas. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.011
  35. Scott, R. E. (2019). Academic Library Use is Positively Related to a Variety of Educational Outcomes. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(3), 144–146. https://doi.org/10.18438/EBLIP29583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29583
  36. Sieber, J. E., & Tolich, M. (2013). Planning ethically responsible research (2nd ed.). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335162
  37. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  38. Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2012). Article and book reading patterns of scholars: Findings for publishers. Learned publishing, 25(4), 279-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20120407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1087/20120407
  39. Walton, G. (2018). Supporting student wellbeing in the university library: A core service or a distraction?. New review of academic librarianship, 24(2), 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1418240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1418240
  40. Weber, H., Hillmert, S., & Rott, K. J. (2018). Can digital information literacy among undergraduates be improved? Evidence from an experimental study. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449740
  41. Wong, S. H. R., & Webb, T. D. (2011). Uncovering meaningful correlation between student academic performance and library material usage. College & Research Libraries, 72(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-129
  42. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 140 Download : 44