Copyright (c) 2026 Rabia Anwar; Areesha Batool (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Taiwan as a Maritime Pivot: Sea Power Competition in the Northwest Pacific
Corresponding Author(s) : Rabia Anwar
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities,
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July
Abstract
Taiwan’s geographical position as being centrally located within the First Island Chain makes it an important player in the maritime geography of the Northwest Pacific and an arena of growing strategic competition between the United States and China. The geopolitical significance of Taiwan in the First Island Chain is analyzed from the perspective of maritime geography and its role in influencing great power politics in the Northwest Pacific through the sea power theory propounded by Alfred Thayer Mahan. The current work emphasizes the significance of having control over maritime spaces and lanes to maintain the power equilibrium of states. However, previous research has neglected the role of maritime geography and strategic discourse in the long-term trends. The purpose of this research is to fill the research gap by utilizing discourse analysis of the national security strategies, defense white papers, and naval doctrines of both the US and China for the period 1991-2025. The focus on Taiwan is as an example of sovereignty conflicts and a maritime pivot. The findings demonstrate a transition from the unquestionable supremacy of the US in the oceanic domain to a situation in which strategic competition is characterized by the Chinese Anti-access/area-denial system, along with other forms of competition in different spheres such as the economy and technology. In general, it is found that no matter what geographical conditions and naval innovations exist, deterrence and crisis management play a crucial role.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
- Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Anh CườngNguyễn, Minh TiếnPhạm, ViệtHùngNguyễn, &BáchHiếuTrần. (2024). Explaining the increase of China’s power in the South China Sea through international relation theories. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2383107
- Buzan, B., &Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
- Clinton, H. (2011). America’s Pacific century. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/
- Friedberg, A. L. (2011). A contest for supremacy: China, America, and the struggle for mastery in Asia. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Green, M. J. (2017). By more than providence: Grand strategy and American power in the Asia Pacific since 1783. Columbia University Press. https://cup.columbia.edu/book/by-more-than-providence/9780231171898
- Heginbotham, E., Nixon, M., Morgan, F., Heim, J., Hagen, J., Li, S., Engstrom, J., Libicki, M., DeWeese, J., Raghavan, S., & Siler-Evans, K. (2015). The U.S.–China military scorecard. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR392.html
- China’s Military Strategy (2015) China’s Military Strategy (2015). (2015). https://jamestown.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/China%E2%80%99s-Military-Strategy-2015.pdf
- Corps, M., United States. Navy Department, & United States. Coast Guard. (2007). A cooperative strategy for 21st century seapower. United States Marine Corps, United States Dept. Of The Navy, United States Coast Guard.
- HOLMES, J. R., & YOSHIHARA, T. (2005). The Influence of Mahan upon China’s Maritime Strategy. Comparative Strategy, 24(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495930590929663
- Lokeren (ret.), L. V. (2015). https://the-naval-report.blogspot.com/2015/06/chinas-green-water-navy.html [Map].
- Mahan, A. T. (1890). The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Little, Brown and Company.
- Medcalf, R. (2020). Indo-Pacific empire: China, America and the contest for the world’s pivotal region. Manchester University Press. https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526135021/
- O’Rourke, R. (2018). China naval modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy capabilities. Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33153
- O’Rourke, R. (2025). China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress. In https://crsreports.congress.gov (p. Defense & Intelligence; Foreign Affair). Congressional Research Service .
- Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213516696
- Ross, R. S. (2000). The 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait crisis: Coercion, credibility, and the use of force. International Security, 25(2), 87–123. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560474
- Ryu, Y. (2025).Chips on the deck: US–China rivalry and reorganizing the supply chains of semiconductors.Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8209-3_8
- Sherazi, T. Z., Khan, A., & Khan, H. U. (2020). Great Water Wall in South China Sea: Maritime Designs of China under Mahan’s Theory of Sea Power. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/4.2.22
- Tangredi, Sam J. (2018) "Antiaccess Warfare as Strategy," Naval War College Review: Vol. 71 No. 1 , Article 4.Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol71/iss1/4
- Till, G. (2018). Seapower: A guide for the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686932
- Wirth, C. (2023). Solidifying sovereign power in liquid space: The making and breaking of “island chains” and “walls” at sea. Political Geography, 103(103), 102889–102889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102889
- Wong, C. Y., Yeung, H. W., Huang, S., & Song, J. (2024). Geopolitics and the changing landscape of global value chains in the semiconductor industry.Technological Forecasting and Social Change.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123749