Copyright (c) 2026 Mujeeb Rahman Emami, Mohammad Hamid Muhajer, Sunatullah Ansari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Formulations of Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in South Asian Investment Agreements
Corresponding Author(s) : Mujeeb Rahman Emami
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities,
Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July
Abstract
Fair and equitable treatment (FET) is a central standard in international investment agreements (IIAs) that protects foreign investors. In South Asia, bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and other investment agreements adopt diverse formulations of FET, reflecting differences in treaty drafting and policy priorities. Despite South Asia’s growing importance in international investment law, no comprehensive study has examined FET formulations across the region. Existing research focuses mainly on individual countries or arbitral decisions. This study employs a comparative doctrinal methodology to examine 209 BITs and related investment agreements concluded by six South Asian countries—India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Afghanistan. The treaties were classified according to the type of FET clause they contain: combined with other investment protection standards, standalone, or qualified by international or domestic law. The analysis covers treaties in force, signed but not yet in force, or terminated treaties, and relevant model BITs. The findings show that combined FET clauses are the predominant drafting approach in South Asia, whereas standalone clauses occur less frequently and qualified clauses remain comparatively limited. India and Pakistan exhibit the greatest diversity in FET formulations, while Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Afghanistan demonstrate more limited drafting variations. The study contributes to international investment law by providing the first systematic regional comparison of FET formulations in South Asian investment agreements and offers insights for treaty negotiators, policymakers, and researchers concerned with contemporary investment treaty practice.
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
References
- Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. N. S., & Waibel, M. (2017). The political economy of the investment treaty regime. Oxford University Press.
- https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198719540.001.0001
- Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Link
- Dumberry, P. (2016). The importation of the FET standard through MFN clauses: An empirical study of BITs. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 32(1), 116–137. Link
- Emami, M., & Gul, R. (2021). Diversity in the formulation of fair and equitable treatment in international investment agreements. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 14(1), 79–100. Link
- Emami, M. R. (2021). Fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law: The customary status. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 105, 111–124. Link
- Haynes, J. (2013). The Evolving Nature of the Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) Standard: Challenging Its Pervasiveness in Light of Developing Countries’ Concerns – The Case for Regulatory Rebalancing. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 14(1), 114–146. Link
- Sarmiento, F., & Nikièma, S. H. (2022). Fair and equitable treatment: Why it matters and what can be done. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Link
- Salacuse, J. W. (2015). The law of investment treaties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198703976.001.0001
- Roberts, A. (2018). Incremental, systemic, and paradigmatic reform of investor–state arbitration. American Journal of International Law, 112(3), 410–432. Link
- Salacuse, J. W. (2010). The law of investment treaties. Oxford University Press. Link
- Schreuer, C. (2005). Fair and equitable treatment in arbitral practice. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 6(3), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1163/221190005X00118
- Echandi, R. (2019). The debate on treaty-based investor–State dispute settlement: Empirical evidence (1987–2017) and policy implications. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 34(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siy024
- Tudor, I. (2008). The fair and equitable treatment standard in the international law of foreign investment. Oxford University Press. Link
- UNCTAD. (2013). Reform of investor–state dispute settlement: In search of a roadmap. United Nations. Link
- UNCTAD. (2012). Fair and equitable treatment: A sequel (UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Link
- UNCTAD. (2019). World investment report 2019. United Nations. Link
- UNCTAD. (2020). World investment report 2020. United Nations. Link
- UNCTAD. (2021). International investment agreements navigator. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Link
- UNCTAD. (2022). World investment report 2022: International tax reforms and sustainable investment. United Nations. Link
- SAWTEE. (2020). Investment treaties in South Asia: Trends and implications. South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics & Environment. Link
- Chaisse, J. (Ed.). (2018). International investment treaties and arbitration across Asia. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004360105_002
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. (1969). Link
- Vandevelde, K. J. (2010). Bilateral investment treaties: History, policy, and interpretation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001